The George Zimmerman verdict Reviewed by Momizat on . BY RON DANIELS OF THE VANTAGE POINT Black America and people of goodwill of all races watched in utter dismay as the jury in the George Zimmerman Trial issued i BY RON DANIELS OF THE VANTAGE POINT Black America and people of goodwill of all races watched in utter dismay as the jury in the George Zimmerman Trial issued i Rating:
You Are Here: Home » Feature » The George Zimmerman verdict

The George Zimmerman verdict

BY RON DANIELS

OF THE VANTAGE POINT

Black America and people of goodwill of all races watched in utter dismay as the jury in the George Zimmerman Trial issued its verdict of not guilty in the murder of Trayvon Martin. Once the case finally surfaced (after inexplicably being buried with no arrest of the killer for weeks), it was absolutely clear that Trayvon Martin was “racially” profiled as a “dangerous looking” Black man by a wannabe  cop turned self-appointed vigilante named George Zimmerman.  But, in “post racial” America, apparently this was not at all clear to the policing authorities in Sanford, Florida, who would have never arrested and charged Zimmerman had it not been for the massive national outcry and protests.  There is absolutely no doubt in the minds of the vast majority of Africans in America that if a 28 year old Black man had pursued, confronted and killed an unarmed 17 year old White teenager, who was simply returning home after shopping at the local convenience store, that Black man would have been arrested, charged and eventually found guilty. Such is the state of race relations and racial justice in what far too many people would like to conveniently believe is “post racial” America.

From the outset I expressed serious doubt about the prospects of Trayvon Martin’s family receiving justice because Sanford, Florida is a bastion of White Republican conservatism. The selection of an all White, female jury (one of whom was a Latina) from a Jury pool in this community compounded my concerns. Moreover, the prosecution and the Martin family legal team were reluctant to introduce racial profiling as a key element in the case, choosing instead the more subtle tact of saying that Trayvon was “criminally” profiled.  Virtually no one in Black America doubts that young Black boys/men are profiled as suspects simply because of their race. This is precisely why Trayvon’s murder resonated with Black mothers, fathers and young people all across this country.  Indeed, we must not forget that the “Stand Your Ground Law” which George Zimmerman initially used in his defense was created to defend “decent, law abiding citizens” (White people) against the “criminal elements” in our society (dangerous Black men).  These specious laws propagated by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) with the backing of the rightwing, billionaire Koch brothers have spread to several states. They are part of a calculated strategy to guard against the menacing criminal hordes.

Racial profiling and Trayvon Martin’s right to “stand his ground” to defend himself from a “creepy looking cracker” who was following him, despite being told by the 911 Police Dispatcher not to do so,  should have been the heart of the case against George Zimmerman. Instead, the Prosecution chose to take race off the table and focus on whose voice was heard screaming on the tapes and who was on top in what should have been characterized as a “fist fight” where the aggressor had a gun.  It is entirely possible that a frightened Trayvon Martin defended himself against a “creepy cracker” and was frantically administering a good old fashioned whipping on Zimmerman before he pulled his gun and killed Trayvon.  How is it that in a fist fight, which was precipitated by Zimmerman’s unnecessary and unauthorized pursuit of Trayvon, can he (Zimmerman) claim the right to use deadly force in self-defense? An all White Jury drawn from a predominantly White, Republican, conservative locale concluded that Zimmerman was the victim who feared for his life and therefore was not guilty of murdering Trayvon Martin.

Defense Attorney Don West even declared that it was a tragedy that could have become a travesty if George Zimmerman had been convicted. In an awkward attempt to empathize with the Martin Family, lead Defense Attorney Mark O’Mara equated Trayvon’s murder to a family’s loss of a son in a car accident or to cancer! The Zimmerman verdict and the post-trial gloating by the defense team demonstrate that the idea of a post-racial America is delusional. Substantial sectors of White America have no clue about what it means to be a young Black man in America whether rich, middle class or poor.  The negative portrayals of Black men in the media, some of which are attributable to the War on Drugs, crime, violence and fratricide in America’s “dark ghettos,” has reduced all Black men to suspects. The George Zimmerman verdict was a travesty which did little to engender faith in the criminal justice system.

Recent Supreme Court verdicts further limiting Affirmative Action and gutting the Voting Rights Act of 1965 further illustrate the degree to which conservatives and a fair number of Whites of all political persuasions are convinced that race no longer matters as a major impediment to Black progress. These decisions coupled with the George Zimmerman verdict have produced widespread frustration and anger in Black America.  But, this frustration and anger will be for naught unless Blacks and people of goodwill mobilize/organize to advance an agenda.

 

 

 

Be Sociable, Share!

    About The Author

    Number of Entries : 126

    Leave a Comment

    Scroll to top